SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldsheet who wrote (65481)3/13/2001 6:01:07 AM
From: d:oug  Respond to of 116815
 
[why be an apologist] russwinter (to) Bob Johnson (to) russwinter

... the list of companies I've listed
... we like many (if not most) of the same names
... so why be an apologist for the others?

... [why] bash firms whose business practices you do not like ?
... do not have correct view of thinking of hedging as a crime,
believing in manipulation, and hating Barrick.
... do not feel all the pain and have not developed the hate
that seems to be a requirement to join the gold investors club
(along with being anti-hedging and believing in manipulation)

Bob,

Your elaborate reply was short, but very elegant.

Also, very much the opposite of what you wish to stand for.

My motive here is not for a personal attack from me to you,
but only to perform a service to inform readers of your words,
that to follow your thoughts into action will create, rather than
eliminate, that which you feel hate for.

So that your reply can be viewed in whole
without my cut & paste, it is copied below.

But first, Raging Bull has "found" the wonderfullness of Gata.

ragingbull.lycos.com

Please imagine that i have placed many abatises between us,
as its for your own well-being to continue in error rather than for i
to identify your wayward course to combat the evil you encounter.

> so why be an apologist for the others?
Why relentlessly bash firms whose business practices you do not like ? Direct your energies on the positive aspects of the firms you listed. Sorry I do not have correct view of thinking of hedging as a crime, believing in manipulation, and hating Barrick. Barrick was a perfect trading vehicle for me over the last three years. The only thing I need to apology for is making money in 2000, 1999, and 1998. I have not had a loss in gold stocks since 1997, so I do not feel all the pain and have not developed the hate that seems to be a requirement to join the gold investors club (along with being anti-hedging and believing in manipulation)



To: goldsheet who wrote (65481)3/13/2001 10:34:25 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116815
 
<Barrick was a perfect trading vehicle for me over the last three years. >

Maybe successfully scalping a few points here and there works for you, but I fail to see how the "Barrick approach" has rewarded stockholders. Their chart looks like deep doo-doo, and they are unbelievably cocky for a company that has handed investors their heads.
ca.finance.yahoo.com

In any other industry, the big players would be looking at a big management shakeup.