SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thames_sider who wrote (8218)3/13/2001 8:08:04 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Sweden

Domestic affairs into the 1990s

In the election of 1970 the Social Democrats lost the absolute majority they had held since 1968. But in spite of this the Social Democratic government of Olof Palme, with the support of the Communists, continued in office until the election of 1976, when the nonsocialist parties won a majority. Palme's resignation brought an end to 44 years of Social Democratic domination.

Nonsocialists formed governments from 1976 to 1982,
the first coalition being led by Thorbjörn Fälldin (Centre Party). His government felt repercussions of the international economic crisis of the 1970s, manifested in unemployment and adverse effects on the standard of living. Political discussion, however, focused above all on the question of nuclear power. Fälldin, who had campaigned for the cessation of building nuclear power plants, was forced to compromise on this issue. As a result he resigned in October 1978. Ola Ullsten, leader of the Liberal Party (also called the People's Party), succeeded him as prime minister, forming a minority government in which one-third of the ministers were women. Following a general election in 1979, the nonsocialist coalition led by Fälldin was returned to office.

The development of nuclear power continued to be a hotly debated issue; in a national referendum in 1980, 58 percent of the voters endorsed the use of not more than 12 nuclear reactors at four plants, which, however, were to be used until they could be replaced by other energy sources or until 2010 at the latest.

Through the 1980s, political debate focused on economic problems, including in particular those related to escalating inflation, an unfavourable international trade balance, and unemployment. These problems grew more severe as a result of worldwide changes in the methods of processing raw materials and industrial production that developed from the beginning of the 1970s. Changes of this kind created economic difficulties throughout Sweden's industrial complex, including such major sectors as textile manufacturing, iron- and steelmaking, shipbuilding, and mining. Escalating unemployment generated by the economic downturn was especially significant during 1980-83 and at the beginning of the 1990s.

Unemployment became a central issue of the 1982 parliamentary elections, along with the deficit and a proposal by the Social Democrats to establish a wage-earner investment fund. The Social Democrats won a resounding victory in the elections, and a new government was formed by Olof Palme. The elections signaled a new polarization of Swedish politics, with the Conservative Party gaining a significant number of new seats in the Riksdag, while the Liberals lost almost half of their representation.

The new government quickly took strong steps to alleviate the nation's economic stagnation, including an increase in the value-added tax (VAT) and a sharp decrease in the value of the krona. Simultaneously, pressures were brought to bear on employers to resist workers' demands for higher wages to offset the resulting price increases. Signs of recovery began to appear in response to the government's measures and also as a result of the improving international economic scene in 1983-84. Taxation rose to a very high level, however, as a result of the large budget deficit and rapidly growing employment in the public sector. At the same time, a controversial issue developed over the legislation for the wage-earner investment fund that the Social Democrats and the Communists had managed to push through the Riksdag in late 1983, in spite of unified resistance from the nonsocialist parties and the business community. The opposing groups feared that the legislation would move Sweden too heavily in the direction of socialism. After their implementation the employee funds appeared not to affect the economic system in any appreciable way. Although they suffered some losses, the socialist parties continued to hold a majority of the seats in the Riksdag after the 1985 election. The most significant outcome of the election was a strong advance by the Liberal Party, which had come under new leadership.

Prime Minister Olof Palme was assassinated by a gunman on Feb. 28, 1986, leaving the Swedish nation stunned and in shock, there having been little precedent for such political violence for almost two centuries. Motives for the assassination remain obscure. Palme was replaced by his deputy prime minister, Ingvar Carlsson, who, although a less dynamic figure, followed the same political philosophy as Palme. Little change occurred in the government with the succession of Carlsson. There was, however, a notable lessening of public debate over foreign policy, and without Palme Sweden's role in the arena of international politics, where it had championed human rights and promoted peace and disarmament, was diminished.

The general election of 1988 did not change the political picture to any great extent. The most notable event was that the Green Ecology Party secured 5.5 percent of the vote and thus passed the 4 percent minimum required to enter parliament. All of the established parties lost a few seats each without any significant change in their relative strength. The domestic policy of the Social Democratic government, which remained in office, was characterized by concessions toward a more liberal program carried through with the support of the Liberal Party. For example, there was a considerable reduction in direct taxes on income, and a program was developed for an energy policy for the future.

The general election in September 1991 resulted in a major change in Swedish politics. The main victor in this election was the Moderate Party (also called the Conservative Party), under the leadership of Carl Bildt. The Moderates received 22.1 percent of the vote and took 80 seats in the Riksdag, while the Social Democrats lost 18 seats. As a result, the nonsocialist parties controlled 170 seats (not a majority) against only 154 for the Social Democrats and the Left Party (the former Communist Party) together. In reaction to the election Prime Minister Carlsson immediately resigned, and a nonsocialist coalition government was formed by Bildt. Sweden's deteriorating economic conditions had caused about one-third of the electorate to switch its vote to the nonsocialist parties. Bildt had campaigned on a platform of directing Sweden's economy away from socialism and toward a free-market system. He wasted little time in proposing measures to achieve that goal, including the privatization of state-owned companies, cutting taxes and government spending, and lifting restrictions on foreign ownership of Swedish companies.

britannica.com



To: thames_sider who wrote (8218)3/13/2001 8:15:49 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Norway

The postwar period

The liberation was followed by trials of collaborators; 25 Norwegians, including Quisling (whose name has become a byword for a collaborating traitor), were sentenced to death and executed, and some 19,000 received prison sentences. By a strict policy that gave priority to the reconstruction of productive capacity in preference to consumer goods, Norway quickly succeeded in repairing the ravages left by the war. By 1949 the merchant fleet had attained its prewar size, and the figures for both industrial production and housing were greater than in the 1930s. Until the 1980s Norway had full or nearly full employment and a swiftly rising standard of living.

Political and social change

After the liberation in 1945 a coalition government was formed under the leadership of Einar Gerhardsen. The general election in the autumn of 1945 gave the DNA a decisive majority, and a purely Labour government was formed with Gerhardsen as prime minister. The DNA governed almost continuously from 1945 to 1965. Haakon VII died in 1957 and was succeeded by his son, Olaf V. The Labour governments continued the social policies initiated in the 1930s. From 1957 old-age pensions were made universal, and in 1967 a compulsory earnings-related national supplementary pension plan came into effect. The old "poor law" was replaced by a law on national welfare assistance in 1964. The election of 1965 resulted in a clear majority for the four centre and right-wing parties, which formed a coalition government under the leadership of Per Borten. In 1971 the coalition government split, and the DNA again came to power, headed by Trygve Bratteli.

As a consequence of the referendum on the European Economic Community (EEC), the Labour government resigned and was followed by a non-Socialist coalition government under the leadership of Lars Korvald. The DNA returned to power in 1973 with Bratteli again as prime minister. When he resigned as leader of the party and prime minister in 1976, he was succeeded by Odvar Nordli. Gro Harlem Brundtland, Norway's first woman prime minister, took over the government and party leadership from Nordli in February 1981. Her government was defeated at the polls in September of that year, and a Conservative, Kåre Willoch, became prime minister.
Brundtland returned as prime minister in May 1986 but was again defeated three years later. The Conservatives formed a three-party coalition government under Jan Peder Syse but resigned after one year over the issue of Norway's future relationship with the EEC. Brundtland again formed a minority Labour government and continued to head it until her resignation in October 1996. A year later the Labour government fell and was replaced by a centre-coalition minority government, with Kjell Magne Bondevik of the Christian People's Party as prime minister. King Olaf V died in 1991 and was succeeded by his son, who ascended the throne as Harald V.

Since the 1970s a central issue in Norwegian politics has been the exploitation of the rich natural gas and petroleum deposits in the Norwegian part of the North Sea. The petroleum industry made possible continued high employment until the 1980s, but it also caused a sharp rise in domestic prices. In addition, the industry became so dominant in Norway that fluctuations in the world petroleum market had profound effects on the Norwegian economy.

britannica.com



To: thames_sider who wrote (8218)3/13/2001 8:21:49 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
The largest Danish political party, the Social Democratic Party, led most Danish governments from the 1930s to the early 1980s; since then, coalition governments have predominated, including those of nonsocialist parties headed by the Conservative People's Party and the Liberal Party in 1981-93. All of Denmark's political parties support the continuation of the welfare state, except for the tax-protest Progress Party, which also expresses anti-immigration sentiments. The Christian People's Party criticizes the laws that liberalize abortion and decriminalize pornography. The Socialist People's Party is against Denmark's affiliation with NATO and is part of the movement that opposes Danish membership in the European Union (EU).

britannica.com



To: thames_sider who wrote (8218)3/13/2001 8:51:38 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Purchasing power parity (PPP).
A method of measuring the relative purchasing power of different countries’ currencies over the same types of goods and services. Because goods and services may cost more in one country than in another, PPP allows us to make more accurate comparisons of standards of living across countries. PPP estimates use price comparisons of comparable items but since not all items can be matched exactly across countries and time, the estimates are not always “robust.”

worldbank.org

In 1995, the purchasing power parity (per capita) in the United States was $26, 180.

worldbank.org

At the same time, the PPP was $21, 940 for Norway, $21, 230 for Denmark, and $18, 540 for Sweden. Switzerland, which is the most capitalist country in Europe, was $25, 860.

worldbank.org



To: thames_sider who wrote (8218)3/13/2001 9:09:53 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
So, you couldn't answer the question either.

>>Note that they also have exceptionally low poverty, friendly and healthy people, clean environments, and regularly top international tables as the most desirable countries in the world to live.

Funny, I don't see people voting with their feet to live there. Aside from their lamentable histories, their societies are in permanent decline and have been living off the enterprise of other nations for years.

As Neocon has detailed, you are very ignorant. Perhaps invincibly so.