SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131598)3/13/2001 12:27:32 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
No, since I believe in justice for all. There is no justice to an unborn child being sucked out of the womb. There is no justice to the victims of murder when the killer is allowed to continue to have something that he/she took away from the victim.

No, the paradox in your argument only cuts in one direction. I challenge you to propose a valid argument that refutes this.

BTW, quit hiding behind the sugar coated semantics of "pro-choice". If you favor permitting abortion as an option, you are pro-abortion. Pretending to not be is ridiculous.

~SB~



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131598)3/13/2001 12:35:10 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Do you object to using tax $ to subsidize abortions for poor women?

I said I was pro-choice, I didn't say I was pro-abortion.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131598)3/13/2001 12:46:30 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
..do you have the contradiction you suggested I have?

Justice is the principle. The murderer is guilty and the unborn is innocent. No contradiction when viewed this way.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News