SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131648)3/13/2001 7:24:25 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
We have the death penalty in Texas, and I am very happy with it.

No matter how you'd like to twist the argument to create a conflict for me where none exists, the fact remains that my position is without conflict. You ought to look into this thing called "justice".

~SB~



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131648)3/13/2001 7:35:55 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
How many cells does an unborn child have to have before you see a problem with abortion? Or, are you simply not willing to draw any lines because it isn't convenient to do so?

Life begins when the the fertilized egg attaches to the uterus (and thereby has a chance of survival). In that sense, I would support the RU486 pill.

Nevertheless, I see abortion as a matter of convenience and contraception as a gross lack of responsibility and complete disrespect for the life that has been created because someone wanted to get it on (I would be willing to accept the validity of a woman's right to choose in the event of rape or incest, since it was beyond her control).

As I said earlier, sugar-coating the issue by claiming to be pro-choice and not pro-abortion is ridiculous denial. If more people would make the proper choice on the front end, there would be no need for such denial. Permitting abortion only removes that much more responsibility from people's shoulders.

~SB~