Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (131708)	3/13/2001 10:34:39 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I think your position is at least defensible. Not sure I agree.

To: SecularBull who wrote (131708)	3/13/2001 10:48:59 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Bull you said, "I guess that part of my logical reasoning behind the use of RU486 is that a line can be drawn there too. If the egg has not adhered to the uterus, it will not become an embryo. There are no other times, in my mind, other than conception and birth, that such a "black and white" line can be effectively drawn." Since you draw the line at embryo's, how about in vitro fertilization when 4 or more embryo's are produced and only one or two is chosen to be implanted. All the others are frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored. Eventually they are implanted or destroyed. Is this abortion?