To: hmaly who wrote (134551 ) 3/14/2001 12:20:22 PM From: tejek Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1589396 Ted Re..I said his negative comments were fueling negative sentiment in the marketplace ____________________________________________________________ In a Leadership Vacuum, People Panic By James J. Cramer 3/14/01 9:52 AM ET Today's one of those days where I wish Bob Rubin were running Treasury. I could see him calling a couple of people in and saying, "Look, we have this one under control. Fed's going to cut to 3.5%, the economy is sound, this will all blow over." He would do it on background, but somehow it would come out and traders would feel silly for panicking and bargain hunters would come in and take advantage of this decline. Rubin's now at Citi (C:NYSE - news - boards). He's trying to fight the tax cuts. Arrghhh!! And Paul O'Neill couldn't calm down the right-field bleachers, let alone the traders downtown. Bush? He seems as out of touch about the stock market as his father was about milk at the 7/11. Not that his dad knew anything about the stock market, either. Greenspan? He is spending so much time not panicking that he will eventually have to panic. This isn't supposed to be how the game is played. There's supposed to be a game plan somewhere that would make us feel like the center will hold and that there is opportunity. We don't have a single person in Treasury who knows these markets, save Peter Fischer, and he is a regulator, a faceless regulator who has no presence on Wall Street. So we have to wait for the fundamentals to reassert themselves and the chaos to be sorted through. We can pick at some bargains, but without a larger frame of reference that makes us "feel" as if things are under control (even if they actually are), we get this kind of punishment. Another reason why repositioning is the watchword. Until we get the leadership we need. Until we get the Fed to recognize that the consumer is only 500 Nasdaq points away from crapping out entirely.