To: Jim McMannis who wrote (32223 ) 3/19/2001 4:31:59 PM From: Tenchusatsu Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872 Jim, PowerNow offers a lot more flexibility with clock speed adjustments. It also gives AMD marketing a lot more maneuvering room in their benchmark bragging. For example, when measuring average power consumption, a 1 GHz mobile Palomino could actually be running at 300 MHz 99.9% of the time if you set the PowerNow throttling thresholds at really tight settings. Then you can say that 1 GHz Palomino consumes less power than 1 GHz (or 700 MHz) mobile Pentium III, even though PowerNow effectively underclocked the processor to Celeron 300 levels just to achieve that. At least with SpeedStep, you know exactly what speed the processor runs at all the time, allowing for more consistent measurements (relatively speaking, of course, considering the dismal state of benchmarking these days). But don't worry. If or when Intel comes out with a technology similar to PowerNow, I expect Intel marketing to pull the same tricks. Perhaps Transmeta is right. We need a much better standard for benchmarking laptops. <All I know is that if I'm going to by a 1 gig notebook and run it at 700 Mhz, I might as well just buy a 700 Mhz notebook. Anything else is just marketing...> I don't see it the same way. Every laptop I've seen is plugged in 90% of the time, from laptops at work, to laptops in the home, to even laptops at LAN party geek-fests. Most of these laptops serve as replacements for desktop systems, of course. I think the kind of laptop you personally are looking for is a thin-n-light variety, and even Intel doesn't pretend that the 1 GHz mobile Pentium III belongs in the TnL category. Tenchusatsu