Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (134726)	3/21/2001 4:54:42 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570585

Ted Re..Huh? Sorry, Harry, but you are reaching on that one.<<<<<<<<< Reaching??? Are you telling me the ABA didn't give millions the the dems for their campaigns; just like big oil gave millions to GW. Secondly, do you know which special interest group got all of these professors together and helped take out this ad. I hardly find it conceivable that these 550 guys were just sitting around and one day decided to take out an ad. If you are going to complain about partisianship by the USSC, why ignore the obvious partisianship of the FL SC. You can't believe analysts who have ulterior motives for recommending a stock. You can't believe this group was totally nonpartisian when the ABA is blatant in its support of the dems. Do you really believe there is any basis for comparison between the Fl Sup. CT and the Sup. CT.? In the future its the Sup. Ct. decision that will be the center of controversy Of course it will because the dems. are using as an excuse for losing the election. Denial at its finest. "we didn't lose the election. The USSC stole it" will probably be your rallying cry in the 2004 elections. But I doubt if it will work all that well, if the dems can't put forward a positive program. Quit dwelling in the past. Quit being poor losers. Revenge is a poor motive. Greed is a far better one.