Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (134730)	3/21/2001 11:47:35 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570659

Ted Re..Huh? Sorry, Harry, but you are reaching on that one.<<<<<<<<< Reaching??? Are you telling me the ABA didn't give millions the the dems for their campaiTed Re..Huh? Sorry, Harry, but you are reaching on that one.<<<<<<<<< Harry, what makes you think professors belong to the ABA? They are professors, not attorneys. Do you really believe there is any basis for comparison between the Fl Sup. CT and the Sup. CT.? In the future its the Sup. Ct. decision that will be the center of controversy Of course it will because the dems. are using as an excuse for losing the election. Denial at its finest. Denial? No, Harry, the Sup. Ct is to the FL Sup. CT. what the Cartier diamond is to sapphires. I would have expected partisan behavior from the FL Sup.Ct., not from the USSC. This issue is far from over...it will generate more controversy. As for the election, the Dems didn't lose but you know that....you think if you say that enough, it will legitimize the Bush presidency but it won't. ted