Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (68729)	3/21/2001 6:44:31 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Respond to of 93625

Carl, cool off, I do not have the time nor the inclination to "obey" you orders, I have made clear what my position is, "I DO NOT KNOW". You are sometime getting to the point of irritating me , I am a patient man and the fact that you get me to that point (of irritation) should serve as a signal to tone it down and stop being so aggressive, obsessive, and generally a "pain". What is all that antagonism coming from? Zeev

To: Bilow who wrote (68729)	3/21/2001 6:47:56 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

O.K. Carl......I don't know squat about memory technology, but I know a defendent in trouble when I see one. I still think the case will settle, but in Rambus favor. This document release is just terrible for Inf. Imagine what Rambus lawyers are going to do in the depositions!!!! There is enough stuff here to fill ten hours of depos. And, we may see even more surprise documents!! Read the transcript on the pre-trial. That judge is one unhappy guy. The only reason the Inf. guy tried to offer a settlement (we will not claim you are crooks if you give up your rights to IP) was out of desperation. Not good. Not good at all. And, as I keep having to remind you, it is up to the lawyers now. A good lawyer has plenty to work with right here.....conspiracy? perjury? Intentional infringement? Wanton disregard of NDA? ugh.