Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (68734)	3/21/2001 6:58:25 PM
From: capt rocky 1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

hey pomp, you forgot the leaking of the ruling. that cost rmbs 20 points. here come the judge, and boy is he pissed. i see lawsuits by rmbs stockholders in the future. stu must be livid. rocky

To: pompsander who wrote (68734)	3/21/2001 6:59:55 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

Hi pompsander; Re: "I still think the case will settle, but in Rambus favor." Thanks for being forthright and honest about this. A lot of the posters don't seem to want to make a statement about it, which I can certainly understand. Even Zeev, who holds himself out to be quite the expert on patent law, (though he seems to repeatedly misunderstand the Infineon case for invalidating Rambus' SDRAM patents) won't make a clear prediction here, but you and I will, at least. Yeah, the judge was probably pissed with Infineon, but did you read the other transcripts that I have posted links and quotes to where all three judges (including the Infineon case one), threatened Rambus lawyers? I think that there is a typical stock holder tendency to only see one side of a story operating here. This thread ignored it when Rambus lawyers got in trouble with the judges, but with just this single instance of Infineon lawyers getting in trouble it becomes the only topic worth talking about. Here's the same judge suggesting that Rambus lawyers will end up with sanction and attorney's fees type problems: #reply-15378059 . This reminds me of the apparent inability of Rambus longs to observe the industry conversion to DDR. As far as violating the NDAs, has Rambus accused anyone of doing this? I think not, so why are you bringing it up? If Rambus didn't mention it in their extensive complaints and motions, you can be certain that there's nothing behind it. -- Carl