To: jim kelley who wrote (68756 ) 3/21/2001 7:48:02 PM From: Dave B Read Replies (3) | Respond to Jim,Hi all; I guess I'm going to go party. I'll leave you paranoid losers to sit here in denial as you wait for the inevitable consequences of believing Rambus management instead of the bears on this thread. A lot of you moms and pops will lose a lot of money tomorrow, assuming this POS even opens for trading. Sorry. There was absolutely nothing I could do to convince you to do any other thing than the DA thing you did. Live with it, at least your health is okay, I hope. Don't do it again. Avoid investing in high tech stocks unless you intimately know the technology and the market, and no, Jdaasoc, you do not intimately know the technology or the market. With the outcome of the court cases no longer in the doubt, my posting is going to slowly change direction. I will still trumpet the slow loss of RDRAM market share that is inevitable, but I will now begin collecting statements by Rambus management having to do with their so-called SDRAM patent portfolio (and DDR, for that matter), as well as other management fabrications and worse. This company was a fraud from the beginning, it never had anything that it said it did. Since there are now pretty healthy fraud charges going up against senior management at Rambus, and since the stock is pretty much doomed to halve in price tomorrow, you can be quite sure that the class action lawsuits are no more than a week or two away. The arrival of those suits heralds another change in my posting on this thread. [The last change was when I stopped concentrating on the technical inadequacies of RDRAM vs DDR, and began posting the indications that industry, including Intel, was slowly dropping RDRAM in favor of DDR.] someone but as of tonight, the pendulum appears to be swinging back the other direction. Senior management of Infineon now appears to be a more likely candidate for fraud charges (and don't leave the country until we get that deposition).From here on, I will keep an eye out for articles quoting senior management at Rambus making statements that would be indicative that they did not meet their fiduciary responsibility to properly inform you morons about the true status of the company's technology and patent portfolio. I predict that these comments will be of the sort used by the class action lawyers against Rambus management, not that I have any expectations of finding anything that their fine tooth combs overlook.
