Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stribe30 who wrote (32743)	3/22/2001 12:02:08 PM
From: Neil Booth	Respond to of 275872

AMD's 1.3-GHz Athlon Bests Fastest Pentiums Maybe, with enough headlines like this, Intel's strategy of sacrificing the processor in the name of high clock speeds above all else will backfire. It could start to sow seeds in people's minds that high Pentium Mhz figures don't mean much... Neil.

To: stribe30 who wrote (32743)	3/22/2001 12:11:20 PM
From: fyodor_	Respond to of 275872

Scott: Systems will also be available from majors such as Compaq, Hewlett-Packard, Gateway, and Micron as well. They already are. You can order a 1.33GHz Athlon from Compaq with PC2100 DDR SDRAM and they promise shipping in 3 days. One note: Default memory for those systems is 256MB, which is certainly nice. However, the additional $400 they require to double the memory seems a bit high... -fyo

To: stribe30 who wrote (32743)	3/22/2001 3:25:07 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

The PCWorld article says Morgan is coming soon: Morgan for the mobile market is already delivered to PC makers and is expected to be available in production volumes by the second quarter, the company says. Now, realizing that this latest AMD plan is subject to revision (cough) depending on market conditions, What on earth really is the MORGAN? A Palomino core with 64K L2? If so, how is it that AMD can make Palomini with 64K L2 and with 512K (or larger?) L2 available in the second quarter, but it'll be Q3 before the 256K L2 Palomino is ready? 1. The chipset explanation: Not enough Palomino-compatible chipsets for desktop, but enough for notebook and a few servers. AMD doesn't want to devalue the pipeline of KT133A boards? 2. The yield explanation: AMD is starting Pally production slow until the yield can be improved (either functional or bin-split). But this doesn't make sense because 512K Pally's would be lower yielding than 256K Pally's 3. The conservative manufacturing explanation: AMD is loathe to switch more than 10 to 20% of TBird production to a new core like they did with the ill-fated K6-2 "CXT" core. If they are increasing wafer starts now based on acceptable early experience, it will be almost Q3 before the increased production is completed. Meanwhile, there's only enough output to support notebook market and some SMP systems using 760MP. 4. The Palomino is being tweaked explanation: The Q2 Palomini will not support SSE because this was not ready yet. Notice that the markets where Q2 Palomini are targeted -- notebooks and servers -- do not really need SSE. Another "tweak" is possibly that the Pally core is being tweaked to be compatible with more already-existing chipsets. 1,3,4 kind of work together -- hopefully the Q3 version of Palomino will be more robust w.r.t. chipsets and include other features like SSE or SSE2. Petz