Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MeDroogies who wrote (2510)	3/22/2001 2:51:25 PM
From: Bill/WA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

MeDroogies, <<I would say is that if they were buying, I'd buy in a flash because it means they know something and don't care if they are overweighted>> Agreed, completely. <<It has nothing to do with their vision of whether the company is doing well or not, it has to do with the expiration of options, the need to diversify............>> This is where we will agree to disagree. If you delete your "nothing" in that statement, I will agree ex: Gates sells his stock all the time. However, when a officer MAX'S out his SEC allowance, especially 2-3 quarters in a row, you would do yourself a favor in taking notice. It is more than pure coincidence that their stocks tank after such massive selling, re: massive selling = max selling. It would indeed be a unique experience if Waite, or Dell, or Ellison maxed out a quarter unless they wanted to buy a fleet of 7 meters. In Mickey's case, we're talking $400 mil + per quarter. In any event, it payed off handsomely, Best, Bill/WA