SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1273)3/24/2001 3:48:41 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Jeff,

Just wait until the suckers finally read the rules and regulations for companies registered in the State of Nevada. You think they're howling now... <g>

KJC



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1273)3/26/2001 12:21:42 PM
From: DizzyG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
RE: 3/26/01 - [INVT] From basher suit to class action suit

Seems a similar situation has occurred with INVT. Recall that about a year ago, INVT was attempting to sue 14 posters (myself included) for defamation:

A Utah company has filed a lawsuit against as many as 14 people it accuses of trying to manipulate its stock price through a campaign of on-line insults...

...The company believes the chatters may have been "selling short", in effect borrowing shares that would net them profits if the stock price fell.

Among the offending remarks: Tekrules allegedly said the company "is a scam" and "is run by crooks." A chatter named Gogogadget called the company a "fraud," and DizzyG said InvestAmerica's stock had been artificially inflated through a "pump and dump" scheme - in which promoters hype a stock and then sell it before its price collapses....

Message 13784500

Note: The lawsuit was quietly dropped on 11/17/00.
Message 14901114


Interestingly, the company recently disclosed information a year after the fact, that appears to explain the sudden surge in the float. Follow INVT's timeline in terms of shares issued and outstanding. According to the 11-30-1999 10SB12G the float for InvestAmerica was as follows:

9,790,443 - 1999
sec.gov

Fast forward to 02-15-2000 - 10QSB. Take a look at this footnote:

(A) During the Quarter, the Company sold and issued 15,992,260 shares for $512,528 (avg. $.032 per share)
sec.gov

Note that there is no mention at all about these being Reg. S shares nor does it mention who the shares are sold to. Fast forward now to the 01-16-2001 10KSB with this disclosure:

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Quarter ended December 31, 1999

On November 1, 1999, we issued an aggregate of 5,000,000 common shares (4,500,000 at $0.03 per share and 500,000 at $0.025 per share) to two investors in a transaction private in nature, relying on the exemption from registration in an "offshore transaction" pursuant to Regulation S promulgated under the 1933 Act and/or Section 4(6) and Rule 504 of Regulation D promulgated under the 1933 Act.

On November 24, 1999, we granted an aggregate of 6,150,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock to 1 employee, 1 consultant and 4 directors and officers. The options were granted at an exercise price of $1.20 per share, are exercisable until November 24, 2004 and were granted to the employee, consultant and officers and directors in a transaction private in nature, in reliance on Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D or in an "offshore transaction" pursuant to Regulation S promulgated under the 1933 Act.

On December 7, 1999, we issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 common shares, at a price of $0.5566 per share, to 28 investors in a transaction private in nature, relying on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the 1933 Act.

On December 11, 1999, we issued an aggregate of 4,740,000 common shares, to Daniel Tepper in settlement of outstanding litigation, relying on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the 1933 Act.

On December 21, 1999, we issued an aggregate of 8,148,555 common shares to 12 investors in a transaction private in nature, relying on Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D or in an "offshore transaction" pursuant to Regulation S promulgated under the 1933 Act.

sec.gov

It appears that investors were unaware of the nature of these Reg. S shares that hit the market in Jan. and Feb. of 2000. In fact it was almost a year later until InvestAmerica disclosed that the 15million+ shares were all sold to unknown parties in offshore transactions as Reg. S deals. Further, it appears that the increase in the float for InvestAmerica coincides with the rather dramatic increase in Share Price and Volume in the Jan. 2000 to March 2000 timeframe(Please see chart).
bigcharts.com

Additionally, InvestAmerica appears to have stepped up its PR effort during this timeframe as well. See Link:
opticacommunications.net

Alas, it appears that the tide is now turning as the bitter reality is finally sinking in:

By: DMAJR $$$
Reply To: None Monday, 26 Mar 2001 at 11:34 AM EST
Post # of 136069


To All:

PLease let me know which board member is thinking of organizing a class action suit against invt. No doubt in my mind that we have been ripped off. Going on 17 months now and what does the company have to show for itself--NOTHING. Oh I forgot we have zed with its 20 million dollars in revenue--what a joke. Doesn't even do 1 million a year. Doug Smith should be thrown in jail for that one. Hey all you crooks at invt I hope you read this and I hope you all end up in jail.

ragingbull.lycos.com

By: duraace
Reply To: 136062 by DMAJR $$$ Monday, 26 Mar 2001 at 11:51 AM EST
Post # of 136073


DMAJR- ditto. eom

ragingbull.lycos.com

By: tekrules
Reply To: 136063 by DMAJR $$$ Monday, 26 Mar 2001 at 11:55 AM EST
Post # of 136069


DMAJR - NO DOUBT ITS A SCAM

I was saying that over a year ago. Then the scam artists tried to quiet me by naming my alias in a lawsuit. That should have really given credence to it being a scam.

Why the heck would some two bit company name 12 people in a lawsuit? They were trying to quiet them down!!!

What a SCAM it was!!!

ragingbull.lycos.com

By: wadgras $$$
Reply To: None Monday, 26 Mar 2001 at 12:01 PM EST
Post # of 136082


DMAJR - You can join my suit, but I get to be lead plaintiff, OK? However, you'll have to be patient, b/c I'm giving these guys three more months (end of June) to get their azzes in gear and prove that they are in the business of selling something other than Reg S shares. I've had preliminary discussion with one of my securities litigator buddies and, based on the skewed factual scenario I presented him, he had a large smile on his face.

ragingbull.lycos.com

Looks like the "bashers" were right after all. The most disturbing aspect of all of this is that INVT had the gall to file a lawsuit claiming "defamation" and "short selling". It appears that the lawsuit was nothing more than a ruse whose sole purpose was to divert attention away from the "real" action occurring with the Reg. S shares.

Diz-



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1273)5/31/2001 12:43:56 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 12465
 
Re: 5/31/01 - [IFTP/ENP] ENP halted after IFTP Chairman Daniel Hoyng pre-announces merger details

Dear Shareholders,

I am proud to announce that a definitive agreement for the sale of Infotopia Ohio (the operating entity which contains all the revenue and expenses of the Company) to EntrePort (AMEX: ENP) will be completed today. The deal has been modified and is now a much better deal for the shareholders of Infotopia (OTCBB: IFTP). The $2,000,000.00 in cash that was originally included has been reduced to $500,000.00 and the shares that ENP shareholders will now keep has been increased from 680,000 shares to one million shares. In order to reduce EntrePort shareholders to one million shares, EntrePort will undertake a 19:1 reverse split, prior to the completion of the acquisition of Infotopia Ohio. Infotopia Nevada will receive 13,100,000 units, consisting of one common share of common stock and ½ warrant at $5.00 per share and a 1/4 warrant at $12.00 per share. The total issued and outstanding in ENP will be approximately 15,400,000 shares. Infotopia Nevada will hold 85.1% ownership in the new share structure in ENP after the acquisition of Infotopia Ohio is completed.

Infotopia Nevada (IFTP) will continue to trade on the OTCBB until such time as a liquidating distribution is made to its shareholders of the ENP units. A liquidating distribution cannot take place until the units have been registered and the common shares in the units are free trading. ENP will agree to file a registration statement on those units within sixty days of the completion of the acquisition of Infotopia, Ohio. Infotopia Nevada will change its name to I Holdings and change its symbol to IHLD also upon the completion of the sales of Infotopia, Ohio. This will help alleviate any confusion between the new ENP, with Infotopia Ohio and Infotopia Nevada (IFTP). Until a liquidating distribution is completed, as a result of its 85% holdings IHLD will continue to report 100% of the revenue and 85% of the profit of the new ENP, which would then include Infotopia, Ohio.

Infotopia Ohio will immediately change its name to ModernBrands, Inc. and when the EntrePort transaction is completed, will apply for the symbol MDB to trade on the American Stock exchange. As a result of the definitive agreement between ENP and Infotopia. Infotopia Ohio plans to complete a series of strategic partnerships and acquisitions that will further establish the new ModernBrands, Inc. as one of the fastest growing, innovative, Brand Building Companies in the United States.

How does the sale of Infotopia Ohio to ENP increase shareholder value?

The increase in shareholder value will come from a variety of sources:

1. . The primary value will be that financial institutions and analysts will now be able to provide independent evaluations of our Company’s progress. The Company’s growth can be properly evaluated and our success should make us an attractive candidate to many institutions.

2. American Stock exchange shares are now marginable. This should provide additional liquidity to our shareholders and help to keep long-term believers in Infotopia from selling stock when they need liquidity.

3. The ability to track short positions will be of significant value to the shareholders and Company; we will be able to more closely monitor the movement of our stock and work quickly to help identify problems areas and work closely to resolve problem areas.

When will the EntrePort transaction be finalized?

Proxy statements are being prepared at this time and should be submitted to the SEC next week. It is anticipated this process is to be completed by approximately July 15, 2001. At this time the symbol of ENP is anticipated to become MDB.

What firm will be our specialist for the American Stock Exchange?

Our specialist will be Bear Hunter Specialists, LLC, who will utilize AEGIS Specialist, LLC. This strategic relationship is a key component to our Company’s future success in capital support. Bear Hunter is jointly owned by Bear Stearns & company, Inc. and Hunter Partners, LLC and is the second largest specialist firm on the floor of the American Stock Exchange. Bear Hunter represents the financial resources of one of Wall Street’s leading investment banks, Bear Stearns & Company, Inc., combined with market knowledge, advanced technology and trading expertise of Hunters Partners LLC. AEGIS specialist LLC has a significant presence in equities trading on the AMEX Floor for the past twenty-five years.

Will the dilution stop when Infotopia begins trading on the AMEX?

Dilution has been necessary to fund the growth and launch of the successful products that have now brought us to this point. However, we reach positive cash flow in June and our confident that the type of dilution that has occurred in the past is over. MDB outstanding shares should remain fairly constant.

What made ENP so attractive as opposed to a company with real revenues and an already operating business that could have complimented Infotopia?

Significant dilution would have occurred for our shareholders, we minimized additional dilution, and maintained control of our Company and achieved our objective of reaching a national market.

Will the Officer Contracts be changed?

All the officer’s contracts have been changed eliminating all the provision as was published in regards to stock. Daniel Hoyng, Ernest Zavoral and Marek Lozowicki have also removed the percentage options that allowed them to acquire additional shares when the issued shares were increased. An employee stock option program that will grant employees options at market will replace all current stock items in employment contracts. These changes were made to make the Company attractive to institutional investors.

Will the Board of Directors be changed?

The Board of Directors of the new ENP will consist of Daniel Hoyng, Ernest Zavoral and three outside directors.

Sincerely,

Daniel Hoyng
Chairman & CEO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This information includes "forward-looking statements" that include risk and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially due to a variety of factors, including without limitation the Company's ability to produce and market products and/or services and other risks detailed from time to time in their Company's reports filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

[Note: Original version removed from IFTP web site]

ragingbull.lycos.com

=====

By: keoana $$$$
Reply To: 352 by mannaman $$$$ Thursday, 31 May 2001 at 8:33 AM EDT
Post #355 of 379


A history lesson:

As CEO of NBMX, Hoyng sold Infotopia Ohio to Dr. Abravanel's Formulas, Inc., took over control, and then changed its name to Infotopia, Inc.
findarticles.com

NBMX shareholders were promised a property dividend of "one share of Infotopia, Inc. restricted common stock for each 11.782 shares of National Boston Medical, Inc."
findarticles.com

Eight days later, the effective date of the property distribution was delayed.
findarticles.com

It's almost a year now and the NBMX (now known as NBMM) shareholders have yet to receive their IFTP shares.

The same pattern is reoccurring here. Hoyng is again selling off Infotopia Ohio this time to Entreport. "Infotopia Ohio will immediately change its name to ModernBrands, Inc. and when the EntrePort transaction is completed, will apply for the symbol MDB."

Will red tape hold up the distribution of shares this time of ENP (or MDB)?? Remember, preferred shareholders are entitled to receive a distribution ahead of common shareholders. Will NBMM shareholders finally receive their IFTP shares before this merger is completed??

The saga continues....

keoana

ragingbull.lycos.com

=====

By: JPack2 $$$$
Reply To: None Thursday, 31 May 2001 at 10:03 AM EDT
Post #358 of 379


The Amex deal is done deal. Now you see the terms they finalized and agreed to. Same deal as told to us in P/R when merger announced in late April before except for a few changes.

Before merger was 13,100,000 units in exchange for all o/s common of Infotopia consisting of 1 share of common, ½ share warrant at $10, (now at 5.00) and ¼ share warrant at $15 (now 12.00). Warrant price being cheaper is only change is see here. It was 1 to 47 r/m and it seems as long as o/s stays in 400 million range it could be much better. We will see if it is or not but at this point we don’t know for sure.

So we will be able to pay less for warrants is plus for us.

They originally where to pay ENP 2 million cash and now it’s less at 500K. We now save 1.5 million cash. They would have done 1 to 30 r/s and had 680,000 shares in new Amex company. Now they are doing 1 to 19 r/s and get 1,000,000 shares in new company. We gave them 320,000 new shares and they basically paid 1.5 million they don’t get or (1,500,000/320000 = 4.6875 per share for the extra 320,000 shares).

How long will the deal take to close and make exchange well we can all guess how long red tape will be? IMO by July 15 seems reasonable. The point is the deal terms are finalized and I was told Amex is find with this merger. They should be it means they get fast growing company taking ENP place and don’t lose a listing. They don’t want to lose listings people when they don’t have to plus get hot growing company. Use common sense ENP is already listed and Amex is approving this is merger. If you don’t think the deal is done that’s ridiculous at this point. For I know we will be on AMEX and it’s only matter of time.

That also means like I have said many times what we trade at now on OTCBB has no bearing on what we do as new Amex Company. If buying cheap now that’s all that OTCBB offers you. Peak market cap values and thus gains will be when on AMEX this year not short time left on OTCBB.

ragingbull.lycos.com

=====

By: keoana $$$$
Reply To: 358 by JPack2 $$$$ Thursday, 31 May 2001 at 10:41 AM EDT
Post #366 of 379


JPack: Nothing is ever a done deal until all the approvals are received. Here's a good example. CGYC planned to merge with HFD and then take over the latter company's place on the AMEX...very similar to this situation.
findarticles.com

Several months after signing a letter of intent to merge, HFD was delisted from the AMEX and moved to the OTCBB on 3 May 01. New trading symbol for that company is HFDI. Their merger has yet to be completed.

Wait until all the approvals are gotten before you say it's a done deal.

keoana

ragingbull.lycos.com

=====

Reuters, 05/31/2001 09:54

OTC HALT (AMEX:ENP) NEWS PENDING

LAST $0.14

Copyright 2001, Reuters News Service

quote.com