Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (6843)	3/27/2001 3:49:54 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 59480

"Paycheck protection" and "shareholder protection" are not about right or wrong, they're about fairness. So you oppose "paycheck protection" and oppose "shareholder protection" and call it fairness? Go buy a dictionary, flap, you need it. Oh, here's one: m-w.com I already said I would support both; what's your problem? Afraid those union members of yours will object to having their pockets picked? Zoltan, the big union basher and former frat boy Why is it that you bash Zoltan! for once being in a fraternity, but you don't bash the Kennedys or Al Gore for being rich spoiled brats born with a silver spoon in their mouths who think the rest of us owe them the Presidency? Did you miss these or are you dodging? these dues-paying working Republicans nevertheless recognize the merit of having their $10-$15 a week support candidates and causes that benefit the working man, even though they vote Republican for other reasons. Are you serious? I don't contribute to the Dems; why would they? Why consider yourself a Republican if you do that? Oh, BTW, contrary to your silly stereotype, most Republicans work. They may not shovel s*t, but they work. I would love to see Big Business held accountable and disclose where the bucks are going, then ask for my permission as a stockholder.* So it'as OK for unions to force their members to donate to Democrats, but not OK for corporations to force their shareholders to contribute to Republicans? Doesn't this seem a little one-sided? Why not say both are wrong? A DEMOCRAT promoting campaign finance reform???? After Clinton???? He was the biggest whore Washington ever saw- -and that's quite a feat! He never saw a hand-out he wouldn't take, regardless of the source. So tell me, are you now disowning the last Prez?