SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (130993)3/27/2001 5:08:01 PM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 186894
 
John,

A thoughtful person might ask if ignoring global warming, with the possible dire effects for coming generations, is more or less moral than Mr. Clinton's personal behavior.

You have hit the nail on the head.

Scumbria



To: Road Walker who wrote (130993)3/27/2001 5:28:21 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
John, why does it have to be a question of either-or? Without morals, how can we trust that Clinton's actions come out of a genuine concern for the environment? For all we know, he's just posing as an environmentalist just to get more votes, and then when that act fails to win any more votes, he'll dump it like he did Monica.

Don't bother with the standard retort of "Bush and other politicians are no better." Politicians should never be graded on a curve relative to each other.

Tenchusatsu



To: Road Walker who wrote (130993)3/29/2001 1:28:10 PM
From: Diamond Jim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
"Morality is in the eye of the beholder"

So that means that some eyes would not see Clintons cigar trick as immoral? some would think it was okay to take White House furniture, some would okay his lying to America, some would okay his selling of pardons?

jim