To: WhatsUpWithThat who wrote (49892 ) 3/28/2001 2:48:43 PM From: Rande Is Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 57584 Good points, WUWT. Let me know when you have a formula worked out. And don't forget to factor in the euphoria that the home owner feels when he "sticks it to the utility" by telling them to disconnect him from the grid. . . .or revert him to a backup power only status. And then you must figure in the computer-driven equipment that doesn't break down as often due to the steady clean power supply. . . .void of spikes, surges, brown power, insufficient voltage, etc. . . .it may sound nuts to some, but having owned digital recording studios and other business that have multiple computer-driven systems. . . having pure steady power could save many thousands in downtime, repairs and replacements. Forget about surge protectors or UPS systems. . . . I have a pile of them that bit the dust along with the equipment. And I'm still trying to find a way to get a music composition from 1997 that was composed and MIDI sequenced on an Ensoniq Z-76 and saved to disk . . . .converted somehow to another format that would salvage that project. The Ensoniq was designed with a susceptible power supply. . . .and after two brand-new units bit the dust [probably due to a surge of sorts], I dumped them for a Yamaha EX5. A whole weeks work. . . a hundred hours of composing/arranging/programming multiplied by $100 per hour is $10,000 lost. . . . so that figures in somewhere in the scheme of figuring real costs and savings.[In my next house, I am installing a 100 pound line conditioner that I have. . . regardless of the power source, I will know it is clean.] Yes, you are right. . . . there are many many considerations in determining the true value of this emerging technology. . . .on both sides of the coin. Thanks again for your thoughts. Rande Is