SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d[-_-]b who wrote (131218)3/29/2001 5:45:11 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Eric,

four computers in a "network" is not the same as a quad processor box. Then again, since AMD doesn't know anything about SMP it appears you don't either.

You're right again. 4 networked computers is better, because they can run different OS'es and don't have contention for resources.

that sun machine you're complaining about probably is capable of 24-36GB of RAM.

OK. Throw in another $20K for the ridiculously priced Sun memory.

You are sorely mistaken if you think Linux is "better" than Solaris.

Boy am I stupid. I forgot that I like having the Solaris man pages which can't scroll up, the primitive versions of most system binaries (which haven't been improved in ten years), and I hate all of the great shell features on Linux and easy connectivity to Windows machines.

Sorry Eric, Sun is the Apple of the Workstation world. They had a huge lead, and they blew it.

Scumbria



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (131218)3/29/2001 8:07:57 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
BTW, four computers in a "network" is not the same as a quad processor box. Then again, since AMD doesn't know anything about SMP it appears you[Scumbria] don't either

You missed the point. Seeing as AMD is incapable of SMP, nobody needs it.

EP