SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oclaro, Inc. (Avanex-Bookham) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kent Rattey who wrote (1786)3/30/2001 5:12:11 PM
From: Shaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2293
 
my sentiments exactly, doesn't avnx have close to 2 bil in cash, facilitys, and patents, technology, expertise that is cutting edge, and earnings, even if in question.

The difficulty is knowing that we have several quarters of down turn to work through. However to the seasoned value growth money manager, this has to start coming up on some Wall st. screens.

I still have my few shares at much higher prices. I have made a bunch of attempts at buying in over the past month
only to bail. I almost bought in the high 9s today, but the chart was scarey. Maybe Monday with the new quarter, we will finally get a foot hold that will firm up.



To: Kent Rattey who wrote (1786)3/31/2001 5:02:34 PM
From: Shaw  Respond to of 2293
 
Kent can you say the word short squeeze, the Avanex die hards at raging bull are getting excited.

Shorting this stock would have been a no brainer at times. Staying long, and keeping the focus on the long term story, takes positive conviction, and foresight.

To put it simply, selling this story short, is short sighted. I could have shorted Avanex, I didn't, because I have a fair amount of confidence in what they are doing, and am impressed with the level of vision, behind their product development.

We as investors, have a fight on our hands, but to be fortunate enough, to be in at the ground floor, for the build out of the 21 century, is amazing.

Yes we know there are more bumps in the road are coming, as we go through earnings, over the next few quarters, but the worst of the first round, may be behind us, with the recent NAZ bottom holding on Friday. Wall St. has pretty much milked the short side in the tech stocks, for the moment, and probably sees better opportunities on the longside, for now.

If Wall ST. had let the NAZ go through the floor, they would have left no room for the mkt to absorb, coming negative earngings, or some level of extreme disappointment, not factored in yet. In which case, Wall St. could have set itself up for a horrifict melt down, that would be far more difficult for the Global mkts, and the economy to recover from.

Instead Wall St., did its normal thing on Friday, and took us right to the edge, one more time, and backed off. Probably smart money has been picking up shares in xyz, during this. We shall see if the direction of the mkt., has changed Monday, and they run the futures up, for the start of the new quarter. Anyway I'll be there on the long side if they do.

I can accumulate alot more shares at 10+, than I could a while ago, and so can someone on the short side. But the pressure is on the shorts now, to really pound the table desperately, not just stating the glass half full, but the glass completely empty, which as you say isn't even reality.

Think about it, if your short, this is where you can make or loose huge money. If you can scare people into selling from 10 down to 4 or 3 you just made a 60% to 70% return on your money. Now figure you have accumulated a war chest shorting all the way down from 80. Well this is it, short one more time, let it all your winnings ride, and get 70% more on your Avanex war chest. Not. The more we go down from here, the greater the risk for the shorts, with alot of shares short for cheap money, they have no where to hide, when the buying starts.

I am still playing things by ear, making it up as I go along, as events unfold. I need to pay bills so, I will still trade in and out as I see fit, but at the same time, I will also start taking long term positions, but I will save some capital, for a latter possible down turn, as we face more possible bad news, in this sector, over the next few quarters.

There maybe only so much buying going forward, because of the visibility thing, but I think alot of investors and money managers, will be wanting to nibble in here if the futures co-opperate. So I guess its the big boys move, not just Greenspan, or the govt, but Wall ST, the one who premoted all this over valuation in the first place.

Kent, thanks for setting me straight on Avanex's cash on hand status, I should have looked it up, rather than trying to go from memory, I was off a 0, approx. 200 mil versus 2 bil.



To: Kent Rattey who wrote (1786)4/3/2001 4:20:42 AM
From: zebraspot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2293
 
>>At 3-4, it would have more cash than market value. Gee, that makes
sense.<<

Well, Kent, we hit my single digit target today - in spite of your heroic buying at prices more than ten times higher than current.

$3 or $4 is easily doable from here, within a few weeks at this rate. May or may not happen - but, as I'm sure you now can see, it's very possible.

Markets can overreact both ways, you know.
This sure seems like one of these times. We haven't had a really good bloodletting since the Bull market started back in 1982.

And, in this kind of market. and considering the highly speculative nature of their business, that cash ain't exactly just like money in the bank.