SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ZenWarrior's Trading Paradise -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: p40warhawk who wrote (339)4/3/2001 8:37:53 PM
From: manfmnantucket  Respond to of 2462
 
The Debate Continues...

p40. I respect your opinion, but we have differing
premises, I think, and so our conclusions may both
be correct.

>A stock is "worth" its price if someone buys it. True with anything else

Well, I'll grant you that much. But I'd phrase it differently: a stock is only worth what someone will pay
for it at any instant, and has negligible intrinsic value.
You can't sail in it, or rent it, like a boat, for example.

>Sometimes "necessity" forces us to buy or sell when

When are we ever forced to buy? The way I see it,
people really buy stocks because they think prices are going up. Whatever the reason or justification for the
immediate price. They sell because it's not going up
or is going down, *usually* of necessity. They rarely
enter/exit via worth calculations at either end, in practice. They sense price movement and respond with
two instincts - fear and greed.

>Of course the buyer and seller have a fundamental disagreement on value. If I sell you a widgit for a dollar

So, I think this classical macroeconomics model doesn't
apply, really, in an auction market. Usually a manufacturer
sets the price of a widget according to its "elasticity", measuring how many buyers they'll gain or lose by moving the price.

In a stock auction/negotiation, price is what moves in
response to herd buying and selling. An interesting inversion...yes?

I hope you'll say I have you wondering about your
premise on investing too - I secretly enjoy making
people puzzled, just for thehellofit...

:-)

MfN



To: p40warhawk who wrote (339)4/3/2001 8:46:32 PM
From: ZenWarrior  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2462
 
P40: Right now, Zen has me wondering a bit about my premise on investing.

I figured that would get your attention. ;-) So when's your first short oh shorting virgin?? LOL. Don't tell me you're only going to invest in bonds now?

Just remember this P47: *everything* in life is a gamble. Here's what I dislike: all these States outlawing gambling, then running their own lotteries which pay out less than .50 on the dollar! Now *that* is screwed up.

- Zen