SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ptanner who wrote (34886)4/4/2001 5:50:49 PM
From: fyodor_Respond to of 275872
 
PT: The missing piece is likely the OEM and the likely skewing of demand towards lower cost CPUs. There may be a lot of offers in the high-end but what is the depth of demand?

That's exactly it, IMHO. I've employed the same price-model as you have (10-20% below Pricewatch) with great success. The thing to remember is that while bin splits are fairly Gaussian in distribution, the sales curve is most definitely not. The greatest demand is at the lowest speed grades. I use a shifted Gaussian, such that the maximum is at the lowest speed grade. This seems to give fairly good results, although it might actually make sense to have a relative price weighting.

-fyo



To: ptanner who wrote (34886)4/4/2001 6:01:19 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Patrick,

When using the lowest price, you have to take into consideration that the price is kind of fake, that is, sometimes it is a loss leader, with limit to how many you can get, and with excessive shipping charges. It represents 5+% discount to say 10th entry, which is a more realistic which includes the normal profit margin of I guess 10 to 15%.

Joe