Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RealMuLan who wrote (96875)	4/5/2001 8:43:09 AM
From: JohnG	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 152472

Interesting China Daily Story Supports My Comment that Treating Chinese like human beings first might go a long way toward easing hard feelings from the recent accident between the Navy recon plane and the Chinese fighter. China Daily Commentary: Crisis benefits none (04/4/2001) Apparently neither Beijing nor Washington wants to see a full-blown crisis over the Sunday collision between Chinese and American military planes over the South China Sea. However, the US side's handling of the issue to date is anything but productive. While repeatedly calling for the "prompt and safe'' return of the US crew members, who are well treated in a comfortable guest house, and the spy plane, US officials have shown no concern for the missing Chinese pilot, who was flying the fighter jet struck by the US plane. Have any of them shown any regret or offered an apology for the collision, which was caused by the US plane abruptly changing direction? Has the United States offered an apology for the violation of Chinese sovereignty by the US plane? Sadly, there has been no apology and no mention of the victim whatsoever -- even in the US president's address. Instead, the US side has sounded as if no damage has been caused and that the US crew and their spy plane were abducted to the Chinese territory. The US Congress on Tuesday offered a fresh perspective on the morbid mentality of some American politicians. They brazenly cited the collision in a resolution to support their allegations against China's human rights record. This is more than a lack of diplomatic civility. Their logic is absurd just like a thief crying "stop thief.'' Even if the collision occurred above China's exclusive economic zone through which the US claims it has "the right of innocent passage," its landing at a military airport on China's Hainan Island without proper notice still constituted an undisputable infringement of Chinese sovereignty. It does not take an international law expert to understand the difficulty in justifying the claim of innocent passage for a spy plane on a surveillance mission on the threshold of a remote foreign country. Even more ridiculous is the US claim of diplomatic immunity for the intruding military plane. International laws and conventions can not be bent at their will to abuse the rights of other nations. The Americans are clearly trying to lay the blame on the Chinese side. Intruders have thus become victims according to their rhetoric. It might be impossible to convince arrogant American politicians to listen to any other point of view. But if they are truly committed to a graceful resolution of the incident, the US side must not misinterpret the facts. What if a Chinese spy plane caused a US jet carrying out normal duties over their own exclusive economic zone to crash, and the pilot missing, and then landed, without notice, in an American military airport in Florida? How would the Americans respond if the Chinese Government responded like the US Government has? The United States' interception and forced inspection of the Chinese cargo ship "Yin He" on the high seas in 1993 on the baseless allegation that it was transporting nuclear material to Iran is evidence of US arrogance in international territory. The United States takes much pride in its ability of policing the world. But a morally corrupt police officer has the potential to become a threat. The bad manners of American politicians is a result of their extreme self-centredness. Undisguised disregard of foreign people and foreign sovereignty is the logical result of this attitude. China and the United States have learnt from the expensive lessons of the past to co-exist in peace today. But peace does not seem to be cherished by some US politicians. The recent abandonment of the Clinton administration's agreement with the Chinese Government to work for a constructive strategic partnership is a case in point. The Chinese people and government's endeavour to build mutually beneficial ties has been met with such provocative gestures as spy plane reconnaissance. It is the right of any sovereign state to protect its legal interests such as their air and water territory. To prevent a recurrence of the incident, the United States should stop reconnaissance flights in the airspace off China's coastal areas. The mishandling of the current incident may easily throw the fragile relationship, which is on a bumpy course toward recovery since the US bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia, back into turmoil. No one would benefit from that scenario. The Chinese side's legitimate request for an apology, compensation, and explanation is a test of the US Government's genuine attitude towards the bilateral relationship. (This commentary appears on China Daily on April 5, 2001) chinadaily.com.cn.net

To: RealMuLan who wrote (96875)	4/5/2001 9:46:01 AM
From: JohnG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Yiwu. The rules for use of international water and air space have developed over hundreds of years and no country, especially the US, will be wiling to concede its rights under these rules. Under these rules, the US is quite free to place recon planes in internatonal waters --i.e. outside the 12 mile limit. Thus the direction China has taken will be as unfruitful as has been the lack of sensitivity Bush showed toward the loss of the Chinese airman. Thus China's options to reduce recon fleights are to apply some other inducement, but this means such a reduction would necessarily be by mutual agreement. It's just not feasible for China to expect to be able to get what it wants by taking actions that violate these rules because other maratime nations will agree that China violated the long accepted rules of the game. China may say that it has no obligation to play by other people's rules and be successful to some extent because, after all, politics is the art of the possible--meaning applying power in some form to get others to do what you want them to do. The best course here is for the US to show some genuine sensitivity toward the loss of life and for the US and China to attempt to negotiate some less dangerous rules for playing the cat and mouse spy plane game. Alternately, continuing improving relations between the US and China will eventually lead the US to feel it is wasting its time and money on such fleights and lead China to feel that the US recon is not that threatening because there is no chance of military conflict between the two. This can happen if China evolvs to a more free and open society -- which it need to do anyway if it is to develop its economy.