SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob S. who wrote (74269)4/5/2001 5:33:26 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
<have P/Es well under 20.> make sure you adjust that to forward earning projections,as semis are priced more on forward than trailing earnings in my opinion.max



To: Rob S. who wrote (74269)4/5/2001 10:06:47 PM
From: brunn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Chip stocks historically have been cheaper than other technology sectors that were felt to be less cyclical--e.g. networkers/fiberoptic companies. As networkers showed faster and faster growth going into the bubble, their P/E's were expanded beyond belief while the chip industry's P/E's were left behind:

quicken.com

Now, that the market has recognized that CISCO's business can go into a downturn as well, the bubble around its P/E has burst. I believe this is the reason people perceive that the SOX is relatively overvalued--people see how CSCO has fallen over 50% year to date vs. AMAT being roughly flat, forgetting how dramatically CSCO's valuation was stretched over the last few years.

Interestingly, I do believe chip stocks are mildly overvalued in one sense--comparison with previous cycle lows. Semis typically will bottom at lower levels of Price/Sales and Price/Book than we see now. A possible explanation may be rotation--the tech funds that are forced to buy tech prefer buying a sector that is familiar with a downturn than with dealing with the uncertainty of how the CISCO's will do in a downturn.

Finally, comparing forward P/?E's of the different sectors is becoming meaningless as they probably are all approaching 0 at this time.



To: Rob S. who wrote (74269)4/6/2001 9:39:27 AM
From: Doug  Respond to of 99985
 
R.S: I am using the lowest PSR of previous Bear Cycles.