Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (135907)	4/6/2001 11:16:44 AM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 1576822

Tim, It also said that Bush's vote counting method gave the win to Gore. It doesn't matter anyway, because the Reps stole the election before the votes were counted. The fact that criminals don't actually need the loot does not make them any less guilty. Scumbria

To: TimF who wrote (135907)	4/6/2001 2:01:25 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576822

The article does look at facts that can support either side but it shows that both under the legal deadline, and under Al Gore's requested method of counting votes that Bush still won. It does talk about how if the votes where counted in a third way Gore may have won but overall the article and the facts behind it support the interpretation that Bush won FL. Tim, this is really getting old. There are innumerable articles that have come out since the election..some saying that Bush would have won, others saying Gore. The point is we will never know for sure because the Reps. never allowed any kind of true recount. It was the kind of chicken$h*t behavior that leads to uncertainty and questions....and it continues to fester like an unhealed sore. Its one of the things that will bring about the Rep. party's downfall. You do not repress info in a free society and not reap the consequences. I suggest you deal with it and move on. ted