SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (10676)4/6/2001 7:02:16 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Do you want our country to invade their country to set them free and impose our laws on them? Or maybe a boycott. Then we could sit back and wait for Europe to invade us or boycott us to free the prisoners on death row or get us to implement the Kyoto Protocol.

Disagreements over Kyoto are a bit different then slavery. I'm not saying I want us to impose and end to it I'm just saying that doing so is not inherently wrong. In practice there are a lot of difficulties involved with doing this that make it a bad idea, but thats not the same as saying it is morally wrong.

Well, for one, you and I and the rest of the gang could all chip in and raise enough money to buy all the slaves and then set them free.

It might encourage slavers to grab more and give them the resources to do it with. Also many prostitutes are effectively slaves but they are not for sale as much as they are for rent.

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (10676)4/18/2001 3:00:44 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 82486
 
>>Do you want our country to invade their country to set them free and impose our laws on them? Or maybe a boycott. Then we could sit back and wait for Europe to invade us or boycott us to free the prisoners on death row or get us to implement the Kyoto Protocol.

Tell us, how many nations have ratified Kyoto?

You do know that the US Senate voted 95-0 against implementing Kyoto, don't you?