To: Tom Clarke who wrote (10855 ) 4/9/2001 4:26:32 PM From: E Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486 Al Sharpton sees the bandwagon loading up. And the reparations fight suggests it might behoove its champions, late-arriving as they are, to jump on. Actually, human rights groups and some Christian, mainly Catholic, groups have been trying to draw attention to the slavery in Africa question for a long time. Wasn't this an interesting and revealing sentence of Sharpton's:Some of my associates have said to me that I may find blacks and/or Arabs involved in the slavery. (For "said to me," read "warned me.") And the generally defensive positioning, indicating that a slave, when abducted during war conditions, is somehow less a slave, is also revealing. As is "in some form" and "built on religious discrimination." A slave whose master has the right to have sex with her, kill him, torture them both, forbid them to practice their religion, change their names, sell their children, starve them, and beat or work them to death, doesn't sweat the details. I have no respect for Al Sharpton at all. But I have heard him speak, and understand his power! I saw a notice that he was speaking one evening at a black church in a nearby town, so a couple of girlfriends and I went to hear him. (We were the only whites at the event.) He is a very, very smart guy, and an absolutely skilled, in fact mesmerizing, speaker. Eloquent, moving, persuasive. It really surprised me a lot, because the media Sharpton has always been transparently a demagogue, is my feeling. I'm glad he's going. The result will be more media attention on the situation. But his comments revealed more than he intended them to, imo. And we haven't yet heard his report. It's my belief that he will report what he thinks it will benefit him to report.