Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (1843)	4/10/2001 8:49:13 AM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein	Respond to of 24758

I think the court takes the stance that the child should be protected before either adult You are right, the best interests of the child doctrine (started in Michigan back in the 1970). And your statement also shows loss of due process for the man. I'll try to find a link to the research on domestic abuse and division of men and female perps. The research was done by a psychologist (female) out of U of Alabama, she is married to a neuropsycholgoist I know. Doc Stone

To: GraceZ who wrote (1843)	4/10/2001 12:01:09 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

Men v. women domestic violence findings, a nice summary is at vix.com This is who I was thinking of, Rohling is the wife of neuropsychologist Marty Rohling: Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Vivian, D. (1994). The correlates of spouses' incongruent reports of marital aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 265-283. (In a clinic sample of 97 couples seeking marital therapy, authors found, using a modified version of the CTS, that 36% of husbands and 53% of wives were classified as severely aggressive.) Doc Stone