SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AllansAlias who wrote (92504)4/10/2001 10:37:47 PM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
We've completed 13 trading days of up now on the Old Eco trash, and it's looking like a fairly complete corrective structure. I would expect a wave 5 in the C wave we're in, but it sounds like you're seeing something more sinister. I know you mentioned the possibility that the 3 of the C was subdividing - you see something that has you favoring that scenario?

I don't put too much emphasis on the Ameritrader data; they simply do the exact opposite of whatever the market does. Every day. 100%. I haven't seen that rule fail for them yet, which basically just says that they fight the trend, no matter which way it goes.

I don't have a good read on the Naz trash right now, so since they seem to be fairly in synch, I've been using my read on the Old Eco to help guide my Naz trades. I was thinking that we were pretty much wrapping this move up in the Dow, so I was getting ready to play whack-a-mole. I just don't think Dow 10300 should be breached successfully again. If this is a wave 4, it shouldn't cross over the wave 2, right? I think S&P *could* go up to that 1210 level, but nothing says it must to wrap up the corrective up. The Naz, on the other hand, could go longer, but I think SOX holds the key there. We sit right at the key support/resistance level right now, and it's too early to pass judgement as to whether or not the test is going to succeed. I know where the funnymentals are, so my bias is for failure to retake the levels.

[EDIT: lots of overhead resistance in place in NDX 1600-1700, contrary to the butter we've been slicing through the past few days of up.]

I would be in there fading this tomorrow, but I really, really hate fading your moves...

BC



To: AllansAlias who wrote (92504)4/11/2001 11:08:34 AM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
i agree. i'm getting a bit more confident about a high tomorrow, since everybody's piling into calls again...