Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7671)	4/10/2001 11:46:12 PM
From: Ron Dior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

NTAP at 15 isn't some bad dream you're going to wake up from. This isn't like 1998, where the IMF and Fed put a "fix" in, and stocks rebounded back to new highs in a few months. How do you know that? Do you think that all of a sudden the market is reacting soundly? This market is no different than it was in '98. It is behaving erratically and overacting around every corner. Because we are overreacting to the downside now you feel that we couldn't possibly overreact to the upside? This stock could as easily go back to its old highs as it came down from them. That is the only thing that history could ever teach us on Wall Street. Ron Dior

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7671)	4/11/2001 12:32:49 AM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10934

I'm trying to make this thread useful, by challenging the GroupThink here, that focuses on unimportant things, and ignores the factors that have driven the stock down so far, and will continue to do so. Jacob, I actually don't see evidence of groupthink here (and I'm the one who has consistently cautioned against it on the G and K thread.) How are you using the term? If you're speaking of a general bullishness about the company, that's not groupthink. If you're speaking of annoyance at those that are bearish without presenting relevant facts to NTAP specifically and the storage industry generally (but are rather making bearish statements based on TA, other "tech stocks", etc.), that is not groupthink. What exactly are you referring to, and which particular school of Groupthink are you referencing? Dr.Id@checkingthecredibilityofthedeprogrammer.com

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7671)	4/11/2001 12:54:15 AM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 10934

Jacob, I still do not understand why you feel the need to enlighten those of us afflicted with groupthink. Your position on this stock and the economy are painfully clear (albeit incorrect, imho). What's your purpose? ~SB~