SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (10432)4/11/2001 3:17:47 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Take a guess, Piker;

14:33 ET Motorola (MOT) 12.98 -0.02: -- Update -- First Union notes that on the MOT
conference call, management confirmed that China Unicom has tendered an offer for a
CDMA network infrastructure to support 13-14 mln subscribers by the end of 2002; First
Union believes that this could represent $0.15 -0.20 in annualized EPS vs its estimate of
$0.03 for this contract. MOT also confirmed that some unidentified Latin America
TDMA carriers have opted for CDMA2000; could also represent upside potential for
QCOM.



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (10432)4/11/2001 3:20:41 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
However, there won't be any phone recall or need to buy a new handset. Nokia spokeswoman Megan Matthews said the
company is considering fixing the glitch with a "software patch" for the network.

"Nokia holds the firm belief this situation doesn't require a recall," Matthews said. "It's in the best interest of the CDMA
industry, carriers and consumers overall that the solution of this 1X (next generation CDMA networks) forward
compatibility issue is solved by a software patch to the network infrastructure."

I didn't know Nokia was so concerned about CDMA's welfare. <gg>

Rocket



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (10432)4/11/2001 3:56:02 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
I was mistaken. You don't know much at all. Sorry. My attempt to get specific information from you was a waste of time.

I thought perhaps you could elaborate on specific interoperability standards which were written too broadly, why Nokia did not ask for clarification of the too-broadly written standards, etc. I really wasn't looking for the Nokia party line--that's easy enough to obtain.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News