SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (7710)4/11/2001 7:19:42 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 10934
 
>> I would stay away from the end product manufactures because of the continuing march to make storage a commodity...

OK, so what's left that's safe to invest in?

And don't you dare say gold <gg>.

uf



To: Boplicity who wrote (7710)4/12/2001 5:31:05 AM
From: DownSouth  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10934
 
In thinking longer term, I would stay away from the end product manufactures because of the continuing march to make storage a commodity where the most efficient manufacturer wins, and go with the suppliers that provide something unique. Sure the software argument is valid, but the as time goes by, secondary players continue to move into the space to provide the PC vendors with the needed tools to compete. Time will work against the foot in the door argument too.

I am having a difficult time drawing a conclusion from your statements. NTAP still provides a unique solution with innovations that make their products more effective than their competitors. PC vendors continue to package non-unique storage solutions that fit well in small scale implementations, but fail in enterprise scenarios. Efficiency of manufacturing only applies in the commodity market. The low-end solutions and the solutions based on non-unique (repackaged commodity software/hardware) may fit into the commodity definition. What NTAP and EMC provide are not commodities and low cost manufacturing is the least important factor in their long term success.