Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (35694)	4/13/2001 5:19:04 PM
From: dale_laroy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

"Quantitativly speaking." Admittedly, the signal to noise ratio is relatively low. But if you cut through the noise, he has added quite a bit qualitatively as well.

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (35694)	4/13/2001 7:35:14 PM
From: jcholewa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

> Quantitativly[sic] speaking. A lot of the stuff he's contributed has been of strong quality. Although argumentative and aggressive, he's had a tendency of being solidly right on issues pertaining to upcoming processors (you know, the K7 being a solid move, the P4's FCLK being seemingly useless, 3-cycle L1 latencies being easily hidable, etc, etc..), sometimes setting himself up for a position where he's the only person defending his eventually-shown-to-be-correct stance. His intellectual contributions by far outweigh any attitude problems you might perceive. Well, except when he going prospecting in the Rambus thread and soforth, but everyone has got to have a hobby. <g>     -JC