Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerome who wrote (45419)	4/13/2001 11:25:40 PM
From: Gottfried	Respond to of 70976

Jerome, I wouldn't defend Mr Forbes or his magazine's editorial stance. And the publisher's tech editorials are even worse, like from a high school student on drugs. But some articles and columnists are worth reading. The magazine's preoccupation with 'richest' lists annoys me no end. Other than that there's nothing wrong with it. When Mr. Lam was interviewed for the article his business - and that's all he's talking about - may well have been going full bore. I hear laptops are selling and Lam's customers include many of the top brands. Gottfried

To: Jerome who wrote (45419)	4/14/2001 12:11:20 AM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 70976

Jerome and all, OT *** TD Waterhouse I'm thinking of opening another account - with Waterhouse. Looking over the web site and talking to a neighbor I think it will meet my need for an occasional trading account. If anybody has any objection, please speak now. <g> I found the August 2000 issue of "S&P Outlook" there. Sad and funny - in hindsight, especially the 'weather proof' stocks. research.tdwaterhouse.com Excerpt: The sectors we expect to do best over the next six to 12 months are technology, health care and energy. Among our favorite issues are the financially strong “weatherproof” stocks on pages 4-5. [snip] I guess health care and energy did pretty well. This report is a good reminder that respected institutions can be wildly wrong at ANY time. Gottfried