SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (132507)4/16/2001 6:13:15 PM
From: tonyt  Respond to of 186894
 
"Cisco's inventory balance, at the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2001, is expected to be about $1.6 billion after this charge, the company said."



To: GVTucker who wrote (132507)4/17/2001 7:43:21 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV, re: Cisco

It will be interesting to see how CSCO trades in the coming days and weeks. Should tell a lot about what is and isn't priced into the tech stocks.

For anyone interested in Intel's CC this evening:

nasdaq.com

There have been hints that they may break out the communications group in the report. That should be interesting, I believe flash is a part of that operating group.

That could also tell us more about how the "other" businesses are doing. Just a complete hunch, but if things are worse than expected overall, I wouldn't be surprised if they nixed at least one "other" business, and took a charge. Probably wrong.

John



To: GVTucker who wrote (132507)4/19/2001 9:38:07 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Respond to of 186894
 
there was a good article in the WSJ a couple days ago on csco inventory fiasco. sounds to me like management hubris led them to ridiculous commitments for once hard-to-get parts. that, and their vaunted tracking system failed to realize many double orders, where one order was with csco and another with a contract manufacturer. i posted a link to this article on the csco thread.
Gretchen Morgenson had a good article in the NYT yesterday. left me skeptical that much of the inventory is truly worthless, and i wonder if it will pad GMs going forward.