SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Srexley who wrote (139013)4/17/2001 7:04:33 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Sexy,

Your answer was just as I expected. Everyone else does it so it is ok. That attitude is for weak minded people. I also find it hard to believe that an American citizen running for president has more pull than the actual president. Says more about Carter's lack of ability than of Reagan being guilty of treason.

This paragraph is so full of contradictions, I don't know where to begin.

Clinton presided over 8 years of peace and prosperity. Reagan presided over about 3 years of peace and prosperity.

That is what I expect from the President, and I really don't want to hear about the other cr@p. Airing dirty laundry for political gain is pretty sick.

Scumbria



To: Srexley who wrote (139013)4/17/2001 9:35:07 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
srexly re:" Do you think Clinton allowed the sale of missile technology to the Chinese? "

Clinton continued the technology sales started by Bush.....did you object then? And btw, I believe the sales were of satellite technology and it was Loral who alone provided info to the Chinese to analyze a launch failure. Do you have any other information? US industry was looking forward to cheap satellite launches by the Chinese but for political gains, you right wingers have again begun the cold war. And btw, Scumbria is right, you are getting pretty shrill. Be careful or some snitch will turn you in....we have a couple of them on this thread you know....and they both have lace on their panties.



To: Srexley who wrote (139013)4/17/2001 9:36:36 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
srexley re: " Do you think Reagan was guilty of treason?"

Yes, he sold weapons to an enemy.......



To: Srexley who wrote (139013)4/18/2001 1:37:15 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
re: Do you think Reagan was guilty of treason?

No, treason has to be intentional. But running American foreign policy out of a slush fund in the National Security Council, in opposition to the laws passed by Congress, was unconstitutional as he** and definitely an impeachable offense.