To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (67834 ) 4/19/2001 1:12:56 AM From: Rarebird Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116976 Recent public statements by Fed officials and the performance of the equity market had appeared to greatly diminish prospects for any near term rate cut. Moreover, the current price structure at the front end had implied that the market saw virtually no chance of any action before the May 15 FOMC meeting. So, in contrast to the traditional model of signaling its near term policy intentions with some degree of clarity, the Fed appears to be aiming for maximum impact by surprising the market. The statement accompanying the action indicated that the Fed is concerned that capital spending will continue to erode in an environment of disappointing corporate earnings. Moreover, the Fed cited the risk that the decline in equity-related wealth will eventually lead to a retrenchment on the part of the consumer. Finally, the Fed mentioned some spillover risk associated with slower growth abroad. Most importantly, there was nothing in the statement that signaled an end to the easing regime. This stands in contrast with the pattern sometimes seen during the tightening campaign of 1994. In that environment, the Fed sometimes indicated that, in the wake of an especially aggressive move, they were likely to move to the sidelines for awhile (recall the phrasing "sufficient for now"). The fact that they did not send any such signal today, and indeed left the door open for additional easing by maintaining the tilt in the risk assessment, is an indication of the extent of their concern about the economic outlook. I doubt they know something we "gold bugs" don't already know. Instead, it simply appears that they are finally becoming more aware of the extent of deterioration in the macro fundamentals. A surprise certainly in terms of timing. Certainly does not square with the Fed's public pronouncements and no obvious trigger in terms of data. It suggests a greater concern about the problems the economy faces--namely an investment bust and a negative wealth effect that should dampen consumer spending. The Fed may have been influenced by reports suggesting a bigger retrenchment in investment--such as the huge quarterly sequential declines in revenue reported by Cisco. Also, on this score, the weakness in imports in today's trade report might have been interpreted as more evidence of the severity of the investment bust. The Fed may also have been influenced by the fact that past easing moves have not eased financial conditions. This is a motivation to push harder on the monetary policy easing lever. This seems to be what is taking place. But that's wildly bullish for the highly interest rate sensitive gold stocks. The Fed's Statement maintains the bias that the risks are weighted mainly toward conditions that may generate economic weakness in the foreseeable future. Thus, another 50 bp ease at the May 15 meeting is very likely. The Yield curve should steepen considerably as the Fed now is seen willing to ease much more aggressively. Got Gold? Got Guns? Got Guts?