Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (11898)	4/18/2001 6:07:35 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 82486

Gotta run, by I look forward to specific reactions to my little essay, if they are offered.......See ya later!

To: Neocon who wrote (11898)	4/18/2001 6:20:52 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Thers's a reasonable explanation of the virgin birth? OK, let's hear it. kholt offered a possibility- -with a probability at least 5 million-to-one against. Let's say 5,000,00-to-1 are the odds (and they're actually much worse), that means it might happen 5-10 times in the US per year. You think people in the US lie only 5-10 times per year? And those 5-million-to-1 odds are still smaller because that woman with both an X and Y chromosome has to also have a womb and according to kholts' posts "that rarely happens" AND that woman has to undergo parthogenesis- -extremely rare in mammals. AND if you go for a rational explanation then Christs birth is no longer that one-time miracle event you so desire.