SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (96407)4/19/2001 4:20:26 PM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Skeeter, factor in property tax increases and the picture is worse- just blowing smoke. Mike ho ho ho



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (96407)4/19/2001 4:32:45 PM
From: GraceZ  Respond to of 436258
 
If you read the date on that chart it ends at 1996, here is the more recent data.

nar.realtor.com



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (96407)4/19/2001 5:58:13 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
The Census has been collecting data on home ownership since after WWII, but most of it isn't easily accessible without special software. Next time I go to the library I'll copy it down. In the meantime, here's a few factoids:

Percentage of average income spent on mortgage for average home today - 17.3% (click on housing affordability index)

nar.realtor.com

Percentage of income spent on a mortgage of a single family dwelling in 1991 - 13% (see table 2a) (really huge file - don't bother unless you've got broadband):

census.gov

Percentage of homeownership from 1965 to present - 62.9% in 1965, 67.1% in 2000. 67.1% is the historic high, by the way.

census.gov

I don't think 17% of monthly income is a staggering amount to pay for housing - 25% used to the rule of thumb to qualify for a mortgage - and if houses are unaffordable why do more people own them than ever?



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (96407)4/19/2001 9:51:18 PM
From: Mark Adams  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
Notice the word median?

Homes are getting larger, sq ft wise, and more features. That is driving the higher end up, the desirable homes for those who can afford them.

If you were to look at the mean instead, you might find that the older housing stock improved in terms of affordabilty, especially as people find work and move up and out of section 8 housing/welfare.

I don't have stats to back this up, I just remember reading somewhere about the use of the median which colored the data.