Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gladman who wrote (17996)	4/23/2001 5:42:42 PM
From: GREENLAW4-7	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 37746

DITCH-WITCH I guess selling longs and going short was wrong ?? RightLOLOL Like your post on CORV thread, next time try to critique my post while I'm on the thread!

To: gladman who wrote (17996)	4/23/2001 7:01:30 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37746

SCNT is an exception. They have more cash than market cap and a 60% lowered burn rate. Bought more today. The bad news in the sector (March1st) is old news and priced in. That's why SCNT is so cheap. In sympathy with their poorer and less talented brethren. I have a $3.50 target on SCNT and that may not seem like much but it's a 300% gain. Just a matter of time. And they are actively seeking a takeover from the likes of IBM and HWP so who knows? I got that info from my brother who used to work there as a top exec. He still talks with the guys over there and says they're #1 in their sector and will definitely survive and eventually thrive. For what it's worth. DOn't believe me though, do your own DD. PS - Don't bait me about SCNT anymore. I've posted enough about the company. People are beginning to complain.