Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Saunders who wrote (8178)	4/23/2001 11:40:43 PM
From: Scott Mc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24925

Fundamentals: Anyone know what China imports, they are starting to roll as a country and 1Billion cars will make a difference, their new hiway Shanghi-Bejing is only the first step. In NA all the SUV's suck gas like I drink beer, Opec should also hold together for another 12-18 months, things look pretty rosy as far as I'm concerned, Scott

To: Richard Saunders who wrote (8178)	4/24/2001 12:58:42 PM
From: stan_hughes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24925

Richard - Part of me says that we're still on the upslope of the current cycle because of the inherent inability of the industry to quickly restore equilibrium to the NA NG supply, and another part of me knows that can't last forever and also wonders whether something is going to come flying at us out of left field to bugger it all up (e.g. some kind of Trudeau-esque Federal asset grab). That kind of thought process constantly reminds me to not have everything invested in the one sector, notwithstanding its obvious attractiveness by most measures. Having said that, by my most recent calcs April 20, I am 50.51% in energy. I am way ahead of the game at this point and I'd like to think I'll be nimble enough to close it out without too much of a beating if I start seeing major storm clouds on the horizon. In the meantime, it's still full speed ahead.