Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: timers who wrote (734)	4/24/2001 11:02:51 AM
From: Shack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Tabler, the larger scenario there is flawed in terms of how I identified the larger waves. However the smaller waves are labelled correctly and is playing out well. We are in the little "b" now it would appear. About half way done.

To: timers who wrote (734)	4/24/2001 11:20:55 AM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

AA is probably better for this, but I don't see any problems with it - yet. The upward thrust this morning says we are in either an "a" or a 1, because it unfolded as five waves. If it's an A, it is most likely a zig-zag, meaning 5-3-5 up. It also means that the C will probably make further price progress - higher than A. (These are all little waves inside your black "b") The pattern you have drawn, with the red "B" as a zig-zag, would be violated if the present move up takes out the low from wave 1 down, COMPX 2135. At that point, we'd have three waves down, with no way to make an impulse down. This limits how the remainder of your red "B" can unfold, most likely as a flat, 3-3-5. As the name implies, it isn't as severe a correction, and might not make any further price progress at all beyond this morning's low. BC