Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (12581)	4/29/2001 8:13:50 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

yes I presume that applies to "Societies have the right to live the way they want to. Does that include the holocaust? Stalin's murder of 20 millon kulaks? Mao's genocides? " If so, I find that a rather amazing answer and one that, I believe, few others would agree with. I realize that gov'ts rarely intervene to stop genocide in another country, but that that is because they do not wish for a war- -not because they approve. Stopping Hitler's genocide was done, not to save Jews, but because Hitler attacked countries with mutual defense treaties with other countries (Poland, France, and Britain), attacked countries directly (the USSR), or declared war on other countries (the US). Nevertheless, is there any reasonable person who regrets stopping that genocide? Parenthetically, no intervened to stop Stalin or Mao's genocides because a major war would result. But would it have been wrong to do so?