SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (133608)4/29/2001 1:15:23 AM
From: FJB  Respond to of 186894
 
EP,

I asked Scumbria, At what speed will both K7 and P4 top out at on 0.18 or 0.13? Can you you give me any quantifiable prediction about the MHz headroom of either part?

He offered no reply to those questions. That about sums it up.

Bob



To: Elmer who wrote (133608)4/29/2001 2:01:28 AM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
<BTW, Otellini said McKinely uses 240 million transistors. Meanwhile AMD has never demonstrated the ability to manufacture any large die device.>

Meanwhile Intel has lost the ability to design any small die device.

"We are big, but we are slow" seems to be the slogan lately.

Kap



To: Elmer who wrote (133608)4/29/2001 2:14:24 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer - Re: 'Otellini said McKinely uses 240 million transistors'

I believe a LOT of that is on-chip CACHE memory - which may account for about 150,000,000 of those transistors.

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News