Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: REH who wrote (71291)	4/30/2001 10:30:31 AM
From: richard surckla	Respond to of 93625

Latest from Fredhager.com by: drrviii 04/30/01 10:27 am EDT Msg: 261732 of 261738 "Rambus has chosen to continue their patent infringement case against infineon and we will hear from Rambus’ expert witness today as well as their final witness (whom also may be an expert). Rambus has the remainder of today to present their case of infringement." fredhager.com

To: REH who wrote (71291)	4/30/2001 10:31:51 AM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Calm down.... Rambus will be fine with or without a clear victory in this trial. RDRAM is established and growing and SDRAM is on its way out.

To: REH who wrote (71291)	4/30/2001 11:14:09 AM
From: blake_paterson	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 93625

rolv: stock is in the green and holding... - have we underestimated counsel? - are you looking to get back in? - how does it get to $5 from here <grin> BP PS: I for one think that Bill and James over-reacted to what they heard, which apparently was only snippets of a conference; these snippets are now a "shot heard 'round the world." BWDIK.

To: REH who wrote (71291)	4/30/2001 10:03:16 PM
From: blake_paterson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

rolv, re: In my opinion RMBS is headed down, maybe as far as $ 5.00. My reasons are: a. I do not believe the judge will reverse his Markman ruling b. I do believe that based on a. Rambus cannot prevail in the current case for the lack of expert testimony – the only expert that then will have spoken is on the opposing side... d. IFX will continue their case against Rambus and Rambus becomes the defendant... looks like you may well have been correct on this one... BP