Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: smchan who wrote (364)	5/3/2001 8:10:55 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Respond to of 5315

I dont doubt it either...easy money. I'm just saying many of Kimberly's plays on SI turned out to be more than one day wonders. The dart throwing days. Have a great day! Jane

To: smchan who wrote (364)	5/3/2001 8:46:34 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Well, Sam..... Looks like things are heating up on this thread. Jane "innocent bystander" Jackson

To: smchan who wrote (364)	5/4/2001 3:13:13 PM
From: maverick61	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Sam - just browsing during a slow time - and saw you talking about kimberly's pump and dump scheme. "but I did meet someone who was in Kim's chat room and stated that she would post her picks there, everyone would load up, and then she'd post to SI. The participant told me that once the pick was on SI, the stock would pop and many would take a scalp. This person, of course, may not have been telling the truth, but I have no reason to believe she's not" Trust me, that person was absolutely truthful to you. Kim, Mogul, PuffDaddy, Mod and others were some of the front runners. I wasn't on SI at the time, but knew Mod from another chatroom he ran. he talked too much for his own good. There was loads of evidence - and I don't think it was a coincedence that Kim bailed when she did - and that many of her cohorts either switched handles or started lieing low.