SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tim Luke who wrote (752)5/3/2001 11:35:33 PM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5315
 
In my humble opinion (unlike Lisa I can use the word),
I would say that once the lawsuit has been filed that you should keep quiet.

I think the eyes have been opened as to the activities of Jenna. The rest will eventually be brought to the forefront even if it takes people scanning public court documents :-)

I find it ironic that Jenna is now spouting about "invasion of privacy" after what she was doing to Lisa.



To: Tim Luke who wrote (752)5/3/2001 11:36:06 PM
From: Jenna  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5315
 
you and I are not involved in any legal matter. You are called to the podium after 8 weeks of lies and innuendo that you have found a can of worms and it involves Pristine myself and other accusations. You are back generalizing again. BE SPECIFIC you spoke and I have proof of accusations you made and now you are back to meowing again your typical "Tim Lukish" posts. Hurting people for my greed.... be specific. OUR LEGAL counsel? doesn't exist you are building once again on air. SO you admit now in front of hundreds that the is IN FACT NO EXPOSE AND YOU WERE LYING THESE LAST 8 WEEKS MAKING CLAIMS YOU HAD UNCOVERED SOMETHING. We are not discusing greed we are DISCUSSING YOUR EXPOSE OR LACK OF. So it is now proven there is no such expose. You are only disgruntled and using this board to air your frustration, but this time, Tim you have overstepped the boundaries of terms of use (you did that before but no one took issue before now I'm taking issue becasue I'm back to posting on SI)