Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr.MensaWannabe who wrote (1258)	5/7/2001 11:51:52 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

>>I guess when she reappears we will see if she continues to harm people. << I suppose that's why I'm still mulling over the "harm" issue. Are we talking actual damages or "emotional pain and suffering" The confusion for me lies in the fact that apparently she has 'fleeced' investors according to Tim Luke based upon private communications he has received. Yet I don't see where he falls into that category. According to what I read, the "damage" is within the context of slander. Perhaps this can only be answered by the principals involved. Thanks for you input.