Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Rose who wrote (124785)	5/8/2001 11:51:24 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

some could argue that naveen was much smarter than jeff and saw the writing on the wall. if in naveen's position, i would hope to monetize investor ignorance the same way he did. he played the game and won. it isn't his fault so many folks played the game with bankrupt speculative practices, is it? now, if he was actively pumping "great prospects" then that is unethical, imho. but, if he kept his mouth shut and sold and sold and sold size to the morons, more power to him!

To: Robert Rose who wrote (124785)	5/9/2001 1:07:17 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

compared to some shisters (how does one spell that?) like naveen jain of insp, who raked off over 1B, more than the company's recent market cap, yea. by the financial standards of the bubble, which in other times would be considered criminal, jeffie's $125M is not much. especially given what he could have made had he chosen the naveen jain route. rob When one makes this kind of comparison, you have a point. The real issue is one is just worse than the other. Jeffie I believe is in a hurry to cash out now. I believe he is finally understanding what is going to happen.