Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (124790)	5/8/2001 12:01:09 PM
From: Robert Rose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

<some could argue that naveen was much smarter than jeff and saw the writing on the wall. if in naveen's position, i would hope to monetize investor ignorance the same way he did. he played the game and won. it isn't his fault so many folks played the game with bankrupt speculative practices, is it?> it depends on whether you believe in the business itself imo. nj did not to the extent that jb did (until recently imo). of course most execs are in it for the money just like most of us investors. <g> so yea, following the money can be very useful. :) <now, if he was actively pumping "great prospects" then that is unethical, imho. but, if he kept his mouth shut and sold and sold and sold size to the morons, more power to him! > well he does keep pumping "great prospects", which after the exec defection and all the turmoil just seems so hollow. i sold at 6 and am just so happy to be out of it. risk vs reward?? stay away from insp !